User talk:Terrillja/Archives/02/2010

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi. I removed the speedy deletion template because a Google search reveals that there is a good potential that the organization meets Wikipedia's notability criteria. I linked a number of the googlehits on the article talkpage. Please give it some time for work to be done, and if you still feel it isn't notable, please take it to AFD. Thanks, --PinkBull 17:47, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Talkpages

They are for stating opinions on how to improve the article. They are not articles in themselves. Please reconsider your comments in light of this and consider striking them as they are irrelevant to the discussion.--Terrillja talk 15:19, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

please excuse me, my comment was supposed to be indented to eraserhead but, okay thanks I think it applies to you as well. I will not rescind my comment because it is a friendly reminder of policy. riffic (talk) 17:02, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
One which does not apply to opinions on a talkpage. In addition, I left this on your talkpage, per the banner at the top of this page, I would appreciate it if you left it there instead of copying it over here. --Terrillja talk 17:06, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Userfied page

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} thanks so much!!!!!!!—Preceding unsigned comment added by Garrettmarissa (talkcontribs)

"Rediculous message"

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Explanation for that edit summary, and the unusual reverts? Rapido (talk) 21:49, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

I read it as changing British English to American English, for an article on an American. You might notice that I undid my edits as well.--Terrillja talk 23:54, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
I saw you undid the edits you made, but statements like "rediculous" are a bit uncivil. Rapido (talk) 10:14, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Be careful with your speedy deletions

Please be careful when you tag articles for speedy deletion. You tagged File:iPhone.png as a blatant copyvio when it really wasn't blatant. I ended up having the image restored and the screen blanked out. Be careful next time. NerdyScienceDude :) (✉ click to talkmy editssign) 01:07, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

It was redundant to a better existing image. It was blatantly violating Apple's copyright. I'm not going to go in and edit files to not make them violations, I'm going to tag them and if you chose to edit them so that they are not violations, go for it, but your BS about darkening the screen a little bit so it wasn't a copyvio is a bit troubling to say the least.--Terrillja talk 04:15, 24 February 2010 (UTC)