User talk:GossamerBliss

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, ~~Texas Longhorn Cow Patrol~~ GossamerBliss! I am LouriePieterse and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Lourie Pieterse 09:55, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you kindly for your warm welcome, Mr. Pieterse. Looking forward to a long and storied future of contributions to this great project! BTW: Chocolate chip cookies are by far my favourites-- how did you know??? :) ~~Texas Longhorn Cow Patrol~~ GossamerBliss (talk) 00:08, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heart (band)

In the future I highly advise you to be more courteous when writing your edit summaries, as I heartily resent being accused of violating consensus by making what I thought to be a routine cleanup. I am still fairly new to Wikipedia and would much rather be educated about protocol then be accused of any kind of procedural misconduct. In conclusion, WP:AGF. Regards, ~~Texas Longhorn Cow Patrol~~ GossamerBliss (talk) 04:47, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You made two edits:

"Phrasing, punctuation, capitalization, grammar, inappropriate typefaces."

"rv irrelevant/unnecessary refs"

The first I neither touched nor made comment about.

The second I reverted and replied:

"a) Not irrelevant b) "Unnecessary" is a POV which others (i.e. the consensus) do not share with you."

That reply is courteous and informative. It informs you, politely, that your opinion is contrary to the consensus.

Your third edit, you reverted, and said: "Maybe not irrel./unnec. However, refs don't link to anything, therefore what is being ref'd?"

So, you actually agreed with my first two points, and totally ignored the fact that I had politely advised you that your opinion is contrary to the consensus.

You responded with the irrelevant statement: "However, refs don't link to anything, therefore what is being ref'd?"

There is a limit to how much text one can put in an edit comment, so I had to be concise.

Your irrelevant response suggested that you were unaware of footnotes, so I asked, politely, "a) Have you not heard of footnotes?"

Your response totally ignored the consensus issue, suggesting that, perhaps, you were unaware of consensus, so I politely asked, "b) Have you not heard of consensus?"

Not knowing what your level of knowledge is, I politely asked, "c) Please discuss on talk page rather than removing other people's consensus edits."

You responded: "In the future I highly advise you to be more courteous when writing your edit summaries".

Please advise how I could have been more courteous.

You then said, "as I heartily resent being accused of violating consensus by making what I thought to be a routine cleanup."

I did NOT accuse you of "violating consensus". I informed you that ""Unnecessary" is a POV which others (i.e. the consensus) do not share with you." When you ignored this piece of information, I then asked, "Have you not heard of consensus?".

You are welcome to feel whatever you want, but please do not blame other people for your feelings.

"I am still fairly new to Wikipedia and would much rather be educated about protocol." - That is indeed what I was attempting to do.

"In conclusion, Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith." - I did. Did you?

Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 10:07, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Beware, for we know of your vandalism

I saw the vandalism you committed on the Demi Lovato page. Be aware we know you vandalized it with an extremely inappropriate statement, and it will not go unforgotten. Remember, it's hoodlums like you that ruin Wikipedia's reputation.

I warn you, if you ever vandalize another page I see again, I will not hesitate to alert the proper Wiki authorities.

You've been warned. Good night.

--The Wing Dude, Musical Extraordinaire (talk) 02:29, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be talkin' trash! I used to be a drill sergeant!

Regardless, you should know that posting such inapprorpriate statements on Wikipedia is grounds for account suspension. It's not funny when you vandalize. End of story.--The Wing Dude, Musical Extraordinaire (talk) 14:54, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a stick a chicken-fried drumstick up yo' momma' booty, you jive turkey! You sound like my ol' lady, just listenin' to you yakkin' and yakkin'.

AFD

Hello I have nominated an article that you have contributed to for deletion at

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fingerpoke_of_Doom_(3rd_nomination) Seeker of the Torch (talk) 15:16, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jesus, you may be blocked from editing. Ari (talk) 08:24, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No.

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. Vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:42, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]