Jump to content

User talk:TheDookieMan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, TheDookieMan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Dick Clark 17:47, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sobran[edit]

The Sobran dispute is no longer just over NPOV. The statement that Buckley accused Sobran of anti-Semitism prior to firing him (which I believed until rereading Buckley) is demonstrably false. The statement that Sobran targeted Jews in general for criticism prior to the first accusations of anti-Semitism is, at the very least, unproven. DJac75 15:37, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What needs to be said first is that those who know him know that Sobran is not anti-Semitic. That is a direct quote from here:[1]. Claiming that Buckley has identified Sobran as an antisemite is contra-Buckley's own words. Dick Clark 15:57, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I googled the phrase "Sobran's anti-semitic prejudice" and it produced no hits. Moreover, it does not appear in Buckley's article. Where you are pulling it from is unclear.DJac75 17:11, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You've continued your reverts without having answered any of our points, which seems to me like bad faith. St. Jimmy 00:41, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Once again, you have reverted without attempting to reach consensus or answer our repeated requests for dialogue, making it appear that you are acting in bad faith. Please prove us wrong. St. Jimmy 04:59, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind explaining your deletion on the article talk page? Also, would you base your explanation on Wikipedia policies and guidelines, rather than your own definition of "truth"? Dick Clark 16:21, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, do not accuse people of vandalism falsely. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 21:40, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've replied at my talk page. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 22:12, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

warning[edit]

Check out LewRockwell.com. We may have another wikibattle coming and I'm trying to round up the more stable minds...

Rogerman 19:48, 16 April 2006 (UTC)Rogerman[reply]