User talk:The Improver

You are going to get in trouble for your constant trolling of me soon. Please don't delete my comments or try to involve others in our dispute. Thanks.nxWAVE. (talk) 07:45, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Just to let you know i moved your question to here..--->Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#A problem with another user...Buzzzsherman (talk) 08:22, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

update the user NXWave has been blocked from editing . I would hope that this incident does not prevent you from editing in the future, as his behavior is not normal or excepted here...Any questions pls fell free to ask!!Buzzzsherman (talk) 10:21, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Needing of help

NXWave decided to send this nice email to me: "Hey there Improver motherfucker, how's it going? Not so great for me, fuckwit, since I was banned. And all of this because of you, asswad. You made them all hate me. Well I'm getting back. I've hijacked your IP, now when I come back (Which I WILL) you better wait for the checkuser to say I'm you, and get your ban. Now you'll know how I feel feel you stupid asshole. Oh, and PS: If you post this anywhere I will kill you. That's a fact. Signed, your old friend NXWave."

I have moved to another computer, but I'm scared. WHat should I do? (Maybe I shouldn't have posted this here...)

I'm also worried about hacking and stuff. The Improver (talk) 23:49, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Greetings! I've just blocked your account from editing; looks like you either are user:NXWave (since returned as User:N to the X to the Wave) or know them well enough to join up together. Can't say I especially appreciate what seems to be an attempt at drama mongering. If you'd like, you can appeal this action with the {{unblock}} template, but I do hope you provide a good explanation when you do. – Luna Santin (talk) 22:18, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am... Whatever. I'll just be on my way. One question though: Where is the Checkuser request in question? Just curious.Teh Improver (Whine) 21:46, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's a common misconception that checkusers aren't allowed to investigate without a public request; to the best of my knowledge, that's never been a requirement listed at WP:CheckUser or m:CheckUser. – Luna Santin (talk) 03:01, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is far different from the usual request, but bear with me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Improver (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'd not like to request this account be unblocked, but instead request permission to create a new one and use it. I suggest giving me special rules, like you sometimes do in RfAR. Oh, and one I'd like to impose on myself: If you detect one disruptive sock, ban my ass forever. No questions asked. Oh, and the new name will be User:Su182.

Decline reason:

Please email us at functionaries-enlists.wikimedia.org to discuss this. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 00:27, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Requesting something new

The above address isn'tworking, can you give me the actual URL? Teh Improver (Whine) 18:58, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]