Jump to content

User talk:Theabalisi10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


December 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Ashleyyoursmile. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Moonbyul, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Ashleyyoursmile! 09:32, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Moonbyul. Ashleyyoursmile! 09:49, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. I wanted to add some info in Moonbyul's information that's why.. also will you please don't let other people change her info. Some infos are false:( Theabalisi10 (talk) 09:53, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Moonbyul. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ashleyyoursmile! 10:13, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Moonbyul. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. EN-Jungwon 10:19, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Sorry, I just want to add some of her recognitions, award etc. So, everyone who'll read her article won't be confuse. I'm begging y'all please don't change it.. Theabalisi10 (talk) 10:23, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Moonbyul; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. EN-Jungwon 10:23, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf(talk) 10:47, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]