User talk:Thurn X
Please explain your proposed edits on the article's talk page before making such sweeping changes. Your edits appear to promote a specfic POV, and the article's current form came through lengthy discussions to make it as neutral as possible. -- Kesh 03:28, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
I made small but critical edits in the interest of preserving neutrality. The controlled demolition article on the events of September 11, 2001 and all articles relating to reasonable, scientific and well-documented alternative theories to the highly dubious stories offered by US government agencies to explain what really happened that day seem to be the subject of routine censorship and blatant bias by wiki editors. For example, Dr. Wood, who is plainly a "notable" person by any reasonable standard, has no entry in wikipedia. This is oppressive and constitutes censorship. Others may not agree with alternative theories or the individuals, like Dr. Wood and Dr. Stephen Jones who espouse them, but that does justify eliminating or marginalizing information concerning them.
Extrapolate the future from the online nitwit clamor offered as criticism of alternative theories by their opponents and you have a future of virtual brownshirts mobbing and denigrating any dissent or opposition. I don't think that wikipedia was created to be a government propaganda outlet and a tool of repression. Thurn X, June 16, 2007