User talk:Tikatan

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

nableezy - 03:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, editors who are not extended-confirmed may not participate in discussions related to the Arab-Israeli conflict on talk pages except to make constructive edit requests. That may be enforced with page protections and or blocks if needed. Your personal attacks are also unacceptable, per WP:NPA, comment on the content, not on the contributor. Thank you in advance for following the requirements for participation. nableezy - 03:57, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nableezy What personal attack? you "said" Israel killed and burned their own citizens just like Holocaust deniers say that Jews did the holocaust to gain the world's sympathy or whatever, I didn't attack you don't play the victim, or you meant me calling you a Hamas and Hezbollah sympathizer? your user page literally says that you support the right of all individuals and groups to violently resist military aggression and occupation by other parties, but due to an alleged consensus you are disallowed from naming particular individuals or groups which certain administrators find to be unacceptable. clicking on the "alleged consensus" shows that you said that you support Hezbollah and armed resistance against "Israeli aggression" which means that you support Hamas as well and other terror groups who violently "resist" for example Lion's Den. Now I'm obviously gonna be against those who support terrorists who want to kill my people (and already did so) and want to destroy my country it's not complicated you know. And yes you are a big hypocrite using Haaretz articles you like but ignoring those you don't, plus by saying you don't trust ZAKA for "lying", but completely trust Haaretz although I already proved to you they are a bunch of liars, and regarding ZAKA some of the stories you referred to as lies were just mixed up - not straight up lies, in general ZAKA was correct in what they reported I'll just remind you they were the ones at the crime scene seeing the bodies, not you.

And regarding your comment on the Be'eri Massacre talk page - no it's not based on my "imagination" it's based on the fact I'm a native Hebrew speaker who read all the article and other articles in Hebrew, that confirm that Haaretz isn't reliable, heck even the Israeli Police had to say that Haaretz is lying, the only reason I gave you a Haaretz article to prove my point was because I thought since you only trust Haaretz - I mean that is the only news source you give me articles from, then you'll believe the article even though it didn't fit your agenda, but based on your reaction it seems like you are indeed a hypocrite. (just to clarify I don't trust Haaretz not only because they lie and supply fuel for Hamas supporters like you but also because some of their authors are very disgusting, so even if Haaretz was correct for once I didn't have to rely on their one article to prove my talking point, because unlike you I actually had other news media that supported my talking point like Mojo Story, The Economic Times, Express, Ynet, The Messenger, Business Day etc,)

Just admit it man you simply cannot take facts that debunk your agenda and are afraid that others will see them this is why you blocked me from commenting on the talk page and hid it right? you're just a coward who abuses his power and refuses to hear facts that disprove his agenda.

No wonder people say that Wikipedia isn't a reliable source - because of people like you who silence anyone that succeeds to debunk their talking points and kill their agenda.

Maybe one day you'll realize you're wrong.

Tikatan (talk) 22:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, you dont seem to be able read that userbox or the discussion correctly, but I dont really care. Please dont ping me, I have no interest in talking with you. nableezy - 22:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well I said first that I don't want to talk to you on the Be'eri Massacre talk page but you've continued to send me messages! another reason why you're a hypocrite :)

(also you continue to ignore every thing I say and every proof I give and instead spout nonsense because you have no idea how to refute anything as usual lol)

Tikatan (talk) 23:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

I'm answering your question here since the thread is now collapsed. This is what I've added based on the article you linked. Alaexis_¿question? 19:48, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Talk:Be'eri massacre for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 21:25, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]