User talk:Toriul

February 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. livelikemusic (TALK!) 15:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Toriul. Thank you. livelikemusic (TALK!) 15:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Hope Logan, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 20:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Philipnelson99 and Wordsmith: FWIW, Hope Logan is a fictional character. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:59, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware. It would have been worse on BLPs, but between the edit warring, blatant WP:LOUTSOCK, and lack of attempting to discuss on the talkpages the account has no interest in collaborative editing. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 14:46, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear, I am sorry @Deepfriedokra... Philipnelson99 (talk) 15:20, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happens to us all -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:57, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

living soap character

Soap character Hope logan is currently in a relationship with soap opera character thomas forrester Toriul (talk) 20:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 03:34, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will not be BULLIED ..... I edit wiki like EVERYBODY ELSE... That "Guy" who edit my edits is chidish over a SOAP CHARACTER... I WILL NOT BE BULLIED!!!! Toriul (talk) 06:21, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unblock me NOW Toriul (talk) 06:26, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't block me cuz you don't like my edits.

You don't OWN wiki... Toriul (talk) 06:50, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should maybe follow the instruction in the block notice to request unblocking. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PS Looks like you were WP:edit waring. Please address what you would do instead if you wish to be unblocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:02, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If someone doesn't like my edit and choses to edit my edit not much i can do. Toriul (talk) 09:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should maybe follow the instruction in the block notice to request unblocking.-- I can't... Toriul (talk) 09:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You'll need to address the reasons for the block mentioned in Wordsmith's reply. You can do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page, filling in the reason:

 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:55, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your email confirms that you need to remain blocked. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:44, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

???????????????????????????????????????// Toriul (talk) 08:43, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

. Toriul (talk) 01:18, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

??????????????????????????????? Toriul (talk) 08:45, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will not be blocked forever. Thanks

Shalom

‎Auf Wiedersehen Toriul (talk) 21:42, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 01:21, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]