User talk:Twofingered Typist/Archives/2016/July
Guild of Copy Editors July 2016 News
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors July 2016 News
  Hello everyone, and welcome to the July 2016 GOCE newsletter. June Blitz: this one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 12 through 18 June; the themes were video games and Asian geography. Of the 18 editors who signed up, 11 removed 47 articles from the backlog. Barnstars and rollover totals are located here. Thanks to all editors who took part. Coordinator elections: The second tranche of Guild coordinators for 2016, who will serve a six-month term until 23:59 UTC on 31 December, have been elected. Jonesey95 remains as your drama-free Lead Coordinator, and Corinne and Tdslk are your new assistant coordinators. For her long service to the Guild, Miniapolis has been enrolled in the GOCE Hall of Fame. Thanks to everyone who voted in the election; our next scheduled one occurs in December 2016. All Wikipedia editors in good standing are eligible; self-nominations are welcome and encouraged. July Drive: Our month-long July Copy Editing Backlog Elimination Drive is now underway. Our aim is to remove articles tagged for copy-edit in April, May and June 2015, and to complete all requests on the GOCE Requests page from June 2016. The drive ends at 23:59 on 31 July 2016 (UTC). Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Jonesey95, Corinne and Tdlsk. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:54, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Re: Fargo (season 2)
[edit]Hi Twofingered Typist, thank you for your work on the above article! It looks really good and polished. Likewise for the archiving instructions, I suspect that would be prerequisite especially since eventually I want to see this become a featured article. Cheers and keep up the great work! DAP388 (talk) 17:32, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
- You're most welcome! Twofingered Typist (talk) 18:45, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Twofingered Typist, I'm not sure whether you've opened a GA reassessment before, but as you made this one an individual reassessment, it means that you are ultimately the one who needs to decide when the reassessment has run its course, and whether the article should be kept as a GA or delisted. While a number of other editors, myself included, are participating in the process, your interpretation of how the article stacks up against the GA criteria is the one that matters. I just wanted to be sure you were aware of how it works. The individual assessment is generally best if a reasonably quick result is desired; community reassessments tend to take months rather than weeks. I apologize if I've overstepped. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:41, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thanks a lot for the help in Rishabhanatha. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 21:23, 14 July 2016 (UTC)