User talk:Tyler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:TylerPuetz)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tyler (talk · contribs · count · logs · page moves · block log)
11:11 pm, 3 July 2018 (PDT)

ACC Request[edit]

Hi Tyler, I noticed that you have an created account still still have the request reserved. Maybe you forgot to click the "Created!" link in the actions section? Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 12:08, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Why did you remove my post[edit]

Hi Tyler, I think my post re Andreas Reischek is totally appropriate as he is one of the most reviled people in our particular part of New Zealand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 07:52, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

This is a Wiki, and edits should not contain any profanity or derogatory statements. The edit you made was inappropriate. Please use a neutral point of view when making edits in the future. Tyler | Talk - Contributions | 10:33, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi Tyler,

regarding the article on Ludo Martens, I would like to point out that the man was not a proper historian. he had no academic degree or connection to a university or other academic institution and wrote his books primarily to promote his political ideas (which were indeed of communist persuasion). I changed the article because it gives the false impression that the "history" books Martens wrote are uncontroversial and widely accepted, which is not the case. Personally I believe the whole article should be rewritten, and the dutch version would be a good basis to start from, as it places the emphasis on his political activities and doesn't try to pass him of as something he wasn't, ie a historian. Please note that I have no desire to make Martens look bad, I only did the edited because itw as clear to me the article as written, is misleading (and probably deliberately so).


a wikipedia fan who thinks there's room for improvement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 08:25, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your detailed explanation. I apologize if my undo of your edit seemed rude. I encourage you to read Wikipedia:NPOV, which outlines the guidelines for editing pertaining to maintaining a neutral point of view, without any bias towards a subject. When editing on Wikipedia, you are required to adhere to certain guidelines for editing. For a list of all the Wikipedia policies and guidelines you should follow when posting on Wikipedia, please go to Wikipedia:Policies_and_guidelines. I do apologize if all this seems like a lot of "rules and regulations" to follow, but there are just certain guidelines you have to follow when posting on Wikipedia.
I hope this clears things up. If you have any questions, feel free to browse Help:Contents if you need any additional help, as that page should be able to answer any and all questions you may have about Wikipedia. Tyler | Talk - Contributions | 10:33, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

RE: ACC Access[edit]

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Mlpearc's talk page. Mlpearc (powwow) 16:23, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

ACC Access[edit]

Hi Tyler! I just wanted to let you know that I've suspended your ACC account due to being inactive for 45 days or more. Your contributions show that you haven't been around for awhile. When you return, poke me and I'll restore your access. Dusti*Let's talk!* 23:44, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity[edit]

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)