User talk:Ulcerspar12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello, Ulcerspar12, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 17:02, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Widefox. I wanted to let you know that your recent contributions to Letzgo Hunting have been reverted or removed because they could be seen to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. "linked" is in the source, "blamed" is not. Please be cautious with these sorts of things with living people - see WP:BLP, and WP:CSECTION. There's help for drafting in userspace first, as I think it best this article gets merged. Widefox; talk 11:23, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Fuck off! Ulcerspar12 (talk) 01:49, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Dark Complected Man at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:07, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Ways to improve Perinçek v. Switzerland[edit]

Hi, I'm Nechlison. Ulcerspar12, thanks for creating Perinçek v. Switzerland!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I've tagged your article [1] kindly improve it as it needs more reliable sources and significant viewpoints.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Nechlison (talk) 12:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Caraline Neville-Lister[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Caraline Neville-Lister has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no reliable sourcing, doesn't assert notability unless the documentary is found to be notable...

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Roberticus (talk) 20:58, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Welfare Cap[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Welfare Cap, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

  • It is an "attack page", and appears to be primarily intended to disparage or threaten its subject. This includes biographies of living people that are unsourced and entirely negative in tone. (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks; attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
  • It covers a topic on which we already have an article - [[:{{{article}}}]]. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at [[:{{{article}}}]], or to discuss new information at [[Talk:{{{article}}}|the article's talk page]].

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Widefox; talk 09:42, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Welfare Cap[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Welfare Cap. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Reform Act 2012#Benefit Cap. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Reform Act 2012#Benefit Cap – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Widefox; talk 09:45, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dominic Kennedy[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dominic Kennedy, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Widefox; talk 10:19, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Welfare Cap. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. and other articles. removing maintenance tags without a reason or fixing [2] [3], creating WP:CFORK instead of growing in the articles first, not using edit summaries, creating non notable WP:BLPs & not fixing disambiguation of incoming red links, creating WP:CRITICISM articles and introducing WP:BLP violations and controversial material. Widefox; talk 11:02, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. (majority of edits)

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Widefox; talk 09:23, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Cathal McCarron. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Find an additional WP:RS for such WP:BLP defamatory material - think BBC, NYT etc. It is WP:BRD not BRRD. Is it possible to get a dialogue or discussion with you about these articles? Continuing without discussion and removing the maintenance templates from them is disruptive. We are all expected to discuss and justify per WP:CONSENSUS . About these WP:CFORK articles you have created - read WP:SPINOUT. Stop creating new articles without growing them in the existing topics. Continuing to do this without engaging in discussion or justifying in the (now) multiple merge discussions may eventually lead to a block. Please seek further opinions as this is just my view. Widefox; talk 09:45, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Mark Menzies, you may be blocked from editing. on multiple WP:BLP articles without enough WP:RS - Mark Menzies [4] Cathal McCarron [5] [6] (or caution in changing wording from the source...) Letzgo Hunting [7] Widefox; talk 10:25, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Fuck off drive by tagging. Fuck off censorsing Wikipedia Ulcerspar12 (talk) 19:25, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anti-Communist League of the Caribbean, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anastasio Somoza (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited School of Politics and International Relations, University of Nottingham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Collins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Inside Housing[edit]

Hello Ulcerspar12,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Inside Housing for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 23:05, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Dark Complected Man for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dark Complected Man is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Complected Man until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LuckyLouie (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Basildon Town Centre[edit]

Thanks for making the edits to the article and the AfD. But you haven't given an opinion yet on keep or not. Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 20:03, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Or have I misread the formatting on the AfD page and you are 92.0.165.228. If so, ignore the above! Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 21:00, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Basildon Town Centre, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Woodlands School and De La Salle School. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

I've fixed the De La Salle link - it showed up as a notification for me because the dab page is one I created. But looking at the article raises the much bigger point: a navbox like that should not be part of the text of one article, but should be a template, added to the various appropriate articles. I see you created the navbox, so please sort this out. See WP:NAVBOX. Thanks. PamD 13:41, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Saleh al-Ogaili[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Saleh al-Ogaili requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Qxukhgiels (talk) 18:24, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Abi Walker[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Abi Walker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ToonLucas22 (talk) 19:29, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of EOS (Work Programme)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on EOS (Work Programme) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:14, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Your creations[edit]

Hi. I have noticed that you create a lot of artickes. While this is most admirable, some of them give me pause. In particular, for example, Non-Molestation Order, Charityworks, and Prospects Services appear to have a single commercial link as their only references. This could be construed as being 'artspam' (an advert that masquerades as an article). I'm sure this may not be intentional, but it is however disallowed. Before I delete these articles or escalate, I would just like to have your thoughts - if there is anything you don't understand about our rules, I'm here to help. Regards, --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:26, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

I hope you die Ulcerspar12 (talk) 21:01, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Seetec Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Seetec Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 16 February 2016 (UTC)