User talk:Unicorn2021

December 2020

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nancy Catamco, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Reason "Reverted. No reason to blank cited sources." Your edit summary does provide a reason for your edit, but edits that remove large amounts of information should be replaced with new information and/or discussed within the talk page first. Thank you. Bass77_talkcontribs 07:57, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Nancy Catamco, you may be blocked from editing. EN-Jungwon^Talk 09:37, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Tayi Arajakate. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nancy Catamco without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 09:40, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]