User talk:Usf1999
Mobiletv
[edit]The article Mobiletv has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Merope 05:13, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Why is MobiTV allowed to have their own entry on Wiki but not Mobiletv? Both companies provide a great service to the public.
Spamming of http://spam.mobiletv.net
[edit]- Spam sock accounts
Usf1999 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Mbajd2000 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent insertion of spam, commercial content, and/or links is prohibited under policy. Any further spamming may result in your account and/or your IP address being blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. You are, however, encouraged to add appropriate content to the encyclopedia. If you feel the material in question should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --Hu12 08:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of OneTV
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article OneTV, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Adrianwn (talk) 10:54, 14 August 2008 (UTC)