User talk:Uurtamo

Welcome!

Hello, Uurtamo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -- Infrogmation 21:51, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dual bch independent source

A tag has been placed on Dual bch independent source, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Syrthiss (talk) 14:22, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's all good -- I've renamed (by renamed i mean made a new article and blanked the old one -- is there actually a way for me to delete the dead one?) it to something less cryptic and linked to it from the article that it extends -- I just thought that it made things easier to read if the technical details for this subproof were on their own page. In general, it's nice to have wikipedia access to full proofs, but man can it make a more general article hard to read. Uurtamo (talk) 15:16, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]