User talk:Uzmashakir2

welcome, Im open to talk page discussions

September 2024

Hello, I'm Gotitbro. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. While you [incorrectly] cite Wikipedia policies for removal, these appear to not have been read by you at all. These include: [1] (section links are specifically allowed by WP:SEEALSO); these cat removals: [2] (we always prefer WP:SPECIFICCATS and in this case the broader decadal cats had been listed as they are relevant to the article), [3] (your removal would have been correct per SPECIFCCATS if only there was truth to that assertion), [4] (again WP:SPECIFCCATS), this removal is specifically poor as websites are not only not preferred they are actively discouraged per WP:HISTRS; and this was simply WP:DISRUPTIVE, you cannot simply remove WP:RS and then add a cn tag. Gotitbro (talk) 12:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to BAPS Hindu Mandir Abu Dhabi, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Asteramellus (talk) 00:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Uzmashakir2. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 17:38, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PhilKnight

Didn't get the reason exactly? OR WHAT YOU IMPLY IS I am a sockpuppet of myself? Uzmashakir2 (talk) 06:51, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]