User talk:Vananen

Welcome!

Hello Vananen, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Mosmof (talk) 18:29, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Gigsons (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text

{{unblock|I don't understand why my account has been blocked, I've no information about user:gigsons, why you attach him to me. Please give me explanation or say sorry and someone else unblock me. Thanks.}}

below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Nancy ^talk 19:08, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vananen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand why my account has been blocked, I've no information about user:gigsons, why you attach him to me. Please give me explanation or say sorry and someone else unblock me. Thanks.

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed sock. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 01:08, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

See also these IPs all from the same dynamic pool and all serial editing since User:Gigsons was blocked.

95.68.35.139 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - also edit warring over end dates [1] [2]
95.68.35.230 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - ditto[3]
95.68.45.171 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - self-identified as sock of User:Gigsons [4]
95.68.32.124 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - clear sock of User:Gigsons

So when you pop up with an account created this evening, straight in to the same "end date" edit warring it looks like too much of a coincidence. Nancy ^talk 19:47, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy ^talk 19:47, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In my town are lot of weird subjects, and as you can see, those ip's have only the same subnet like in my ISP. Looks like is not an argument. I wonder how did you even got access to such commands. Thanks. Vananen (talk) 22:25, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So you are confirming that your ISP is LTC/SIA Lattelekom? Nancy ^talk 23:00, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's right. Feel free to contact them - lattelecom@lattelecom.lv. But i'm interested to fast block removal.Vananen (talk) 00:39, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]