User talk:Vee Ate

Discussion at Book of Leviticus

I invite you to join the discussion at Talk:Book of Leviticus#Off-topic POV cruft is removed from the lead so that we can reach consensus on recent content that was added to the article. Thank you - MrX 23:59, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Book of Leviticus does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! It is expected that when removing sourced content, editors will explain their reasons in the edit summary. You have apparently declined to participate in the talk page discussion. Also, continually reverting other editor's edits can be considered edit warring, especially if you do not explain your reasoning and discuss it on the talk page. - MrX 22:31, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the edits/reverts you have made on Book of Leviticus. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing..