User talk:Vigilius4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

I strogly urge you not to delete sourced information of reliable sources directly related to the article just because it seems you may not like it --Destinero (talk) 15:42, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

More edit warring at LGBT parenting[edit]

Why do you insist on systematically suppressing all discussion of alternative viewpoints in the LGBT parenting article? Your deletion of the Stacey-Biblarz quotation, that "researchers frequently downplay findings indicating difference regarding children's gender and sexual preferences and behavior" is particularly mystifying, since this paper is cited in every recent version of the page. You justify deleting the comments of Stephen Nock on the grounds that he "lacks expertise in developmental psychology", but this completely misses the point of his objection, which is raised on statistical and methodolgical grounds. Please consider that Wikipedia's readers are best served by having access to a full range of views. Vigilius4 (talk) 20:46, 8 July 2010 (UTC)Vigilius4

His is not competent to raise statistic and methodolical points in the field he lacks expertize and he still dont know that psychology has other methods than demography. In fact, the research of LGBT parenting is very sound and reliable. --Destinero (talk) 06:02, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Stop doing vandalism on LGBT Parenting page again immediatelly or admins will be asked to block you indefinitely! --Destinero (talk) 09:50, 16 August 2010 (UTC)