User talk:Vikrampandia

Welcome!

Hello, Vikrampandia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Guy (Help!) 20:53, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Todd Stroger

Our policy on biographies of living people means that you must not insert derogatory aterial like that. Do not do it again. Thanks, Guy (Help!) 20:53, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nick names are given and not picked. He is called Urkel and that is what his wiki page should reflect

You clearly are not willing to even consider that what you are doing is wrong, and have not addressed comments raised on Talk:Todd Stroger, so I have blocked you. Guy (Help!) 07:49, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vikrampandia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please provide a link that has the guidelines for nicknames. Unless you can do that, you have no right to decide what is defamation and not. Thanks.

Decline reason:

I reviewed the source you provided, which is about a website that compared him to Urkel, to which he took umbrage. There is no mention of it being his nickname. Adding it as his nickname on this page, especially after having provided that source, seems like little more than a malicious attempt to continue upsetting him. We don't do that here, and you can stay blocked. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:00, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please see the biographies of living persons policy. In such articles, any contested material can (and frequently should) be removed unless reliably sourced; as far as I can tell, the source you provided makes no mention of the word "Urkel." Looks like this isn't the first time this dispute has come up, either. Are you prepared to use talk pages and/or the dispute resolution process to seek consensus, if unblocked? – Luna Santin (talk) 03:55, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]