User talk:Ville V. Kokko

Welcome!

Hello, Ville V. Kokko, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --KFP (talk | contribs) 11:32, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thank you. I'm not sure if I should be responding here, but I will since I don't know any better anyway. I've been using Wikipedia for a while now so I know I am going to "stay". I just thought I should start doing my contributions more properly. Ville V. Kokko 14:46, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, happy editing! --KFP (talk | contribs) 15:44, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spoiler tags[edit]

Copied from Sora (Kingdom Hearts):

It is the consensus of WikiProject Square Enix and WikiProject Final Fantasy not to include spoiler tags because:

Wikipedia is not censored, as shown by what Wikipedia is not and the content disclaimer available at the bottom of every page.
Spoiler tags add nothing to the article. It's quite plainly obvious that a Wikipedia page about a topic is going to have spoilers on that topic. If you don't want to be spoiled about it, why would you even come to read it?
Spoiler tags break the flow of the article by clearly marking where spoilers can and cannot be. Limiting the article in such a way would force the editor to rearrange the article to its mutual degradation.
Spoiler tags are inherently POV because who are we as editors to say what is and what isn't a spoiler? Where is the line in a game beyond which information is considered a spoiler? Is there such a line? The opening scene of a game wouldn't be a spoiler to someone who's played it but to someone who hasn't bought it yet, it is a huge spoiler.

There are other reasons but if you really feel strongly about it, go to WP:SE to talk to them. Axem Titanium 15:44, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]