User talk:Vishnuvrida

January 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Thanoscar21. I noticed that you recently removed content from Saraswat Brahmin without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Wikipedia does not whitewash articles. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 16:00, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Saraswat Brahmin, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 16:01, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The sources presented are biased towards the community in question it fails to address the historical reality and willfully ignores actual historical sources Vishnuvrida (talk) 16:03, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Saraswat Brahmin, you may be blocked from editing. There are many sources cited. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 16:09, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are the one that is upto disruptive editing these articles and sources never existed before they have been added due to malicious intent Vishnuvrida (talk) 16:11, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove sourced content. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:18, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Saraswat Brahmin. Serols (talk) 16:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The people adding those articles are the ones who are hell bent on vandalising the article Vishnuvrida (talk) 16:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Vishnuvrida reported by User:Fylindfotberserk (Result: ). Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see any evidence of vandalism. I strongly suggest you undo your last changes and take the matter to the talk page. Would you like assistance in doing the revert? —C.Fred (talk) 16:58, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Saraswat Brahmin) for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 18:59, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]