User talk:Visionaire87

Welcome

Hello, Visionaire87, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Happy editing! Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 08:52, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:05, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mass Additions of http://.cuetracker.net

Please stop. If you continue spamming Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.--Hu12 (talk) 14:19, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong with the links? Why does one moderator agree with the links and is willing to discuss it while 2 others accuse me of spamming? I checked your definitions of spamming and do not see how my links are spam. All I am trying to do is provide access to more information, surely that is the whole point of Wikipedia? (Visionaire87 (talk) 14:25, 9 September 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Your contributions to wikipedia under this account and multiple IP's consist entirely of adding external links to your own site and is considered WP:Spam. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a link farm.

"I own the website I posted"^[1]

It has become apparent that your account and IP's are only being used for spamming inappropriate external links and for self-promotion. Wikipedia is NOT a "repository of links" or a "vehicle for advertising" . Specifically, the External links policy on Advertising and conflicts of interest states You should avoid linking to a website that you own, maintain or represent, even if the guidelines otherwise imply that it should be linked, which is in line with the conflict of interest guidelines.

Accounts

Visionaire87 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
81.235.243.145 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)
83.221.146.181 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)

Editors make the policies here at Wikipedia, Here are some that apply to your issue:

SPAM
- External link spamming
- How not to be a spammer
External links policy
- Links normally to be avoided
- Advertising and conflicts of interest
Conflict of interest
What Wikipedia is not
Wikipedia:BLOCK#Disruption
- Persistent spamming
- Breaching the sock puppetry policy;
- Accounts that appear, based on their edit history, to exist for the sole or primary purpose of promoting a person, company, product, service, or organization in apparent violation of Conflict of interest or anti-spam guidelines.

--Hu12 (talk) 15:05, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, so you consider it a conflict of interest and I will cease. Please use less agressive wording in future and provide a reason when removing, as I never did nor had the intention to 'spam' anyone or anything. I also gain nothing myself by having visitors or no visitors to my site, frankly I don't care, as I don't make a cent off it. I only provided links in order to provide information, but apparantly this is cause to be accused of spamming (which I really do not appreciate) while having to ask for an explanation why.(Visionaire87 (talk) 15:19, 9 September 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Visionaire87. You have new messages at WT:SNOOKER.
Message added 11:18, 18 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 11:18, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]