User talk:Vsolnaacre

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vsolnaacre (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

simply as u insisted....well no one likes to be blocked either.....without an offense committed who wishes to get blocked...

Decline reason:

If you wish to be unblocked, please make the request on your original account, and not on this sockpuppet account. You may not succeed, but you will certainly not succeed in having a sockpuppet unblocked. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:25, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Pearllysun (talk • contribs • block log • creation log). As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

You do not get to register multiple accounts to get around a block. Please return to your first account and request an unblock using the {{unblock}} template. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 18:18, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

fine ! this is no pearllysun . and i have not performed any edits and since uv blocked me im confident that u'll find no one to discuss with this issue ..... anyhow ill let pearllysun know about this .....returning or not all depends on him .....but personally ill ask him not to .....many thanks for blocking me too--Vsolnaacre (talk) 18:36, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly was the point you were raising in this post? I do not recall any revert histories pointing to adversarial conflict between Pearllysun and any other user, or said IP user who claimed to be Pearllysun. We were just protecting the intellectual property of a user in the interest of Wiki policy. Please reply to this on my Talk page for further commentary. I will be happy to help you in a constructive way. --InvisibleDiplomat₆⁶₆ 18:49, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

well u people have blocked me and now wanna me to write in your talk page ........r u kidding ??? im sure that u know when someone who is blocked will not be able to edit others talk page......or iv mistaken ??? sorry mr im unable to write in ur talk page ..... i think keep on blocking a person for some simple reason will prevent people from editing other things too , u may request or ask the member to not write in some particular areas of much importance ....if he goes against ur rule then as a last attempt u may block him.....but here u people seem to use the block power as something usual and put people like a virtual bar .... by this wht u wanna do??/..........ever keep the person away from this site ??....... sure this is what u r upto ...... first u people should know whom to punish and whom not to ...... now see uv lost two medicos who were editing ur site....one made a mistake but nothing other than writing an article and the other simple supporting him.....now me .... me not an usual wikipedian so ur block not edit rejection or voting ban in no way will affect me since im not up to these work either .....but hose were .....but i think they wont anymore ....i wish if u would write me mails instead of writing here cos as iv earlier said im not an usual wikipedian.....Vsolnaacre (talk) 19:31, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]