User talk:W7n

Welcome!

Hello, W7n, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 02:51, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

w7n gang

Assuming you're the w7n mariohacker person I've heard about, I'd like to say hello from a fellow w7n :D Sorry for using the same alias as you, I didn't know of another w7n until maybe a year after I started using the username literally everywhere It's pretty surreal seeing w7n on a ROM hack you made, since I know it's not me that made it :( I was actually about to take the Wikipedia w7n name too, but it was blocked at the time so I had to use 7R7 instead I think I tried to contact you like 2019 or 2020, but I forgot what happened to that

Anyway, have a great rest of your day - American w7n — Preceding unsigned comment added by 7R7 (talk • contribs) 16:40, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

China

It sounds like you have some irrational hatred of Chinese people. That is not healthy. But don't worry about Chinese people editing english Wikipedia, the vast majority of Chinese people don't learn english.

How am I going to discriminate against my own group? I'm not. But indeed, I should have clarified that.

The thing is, even before I registered this account I've witnessed a few incidents (in Chinese forums) of people editing En wiki either in the hopes of fixing what shouldn't be fixed at all or for propaganda purposes. When I reversed some of the edits, there were even people who don't know how Wikipedia works ridiculing me for making their efforts go to waste.

Moreover, there's the problem against neutrality. Not that there aren't wiki articles which are genuinely biased, but when they actually are pretty neutral, people have the mindset that only viewpoints in favour of their own group are right and thus the fixing of what shouldn't be fixed. Of course, neutrality != righteousness, but the latter is relatively much more subjective and in some cases can't be defined at all. Making edits to publicise one's own interpretation of righteousness is what I meant to oppose. W7n (talk) 07:31, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]