User talk:Walteria

copyvio

I was the one interviewed so I grant permission to use article in Wikipedia (edit summary to Waltles). I have news for you: being the subject of an interview does not actually give you copyright over the published interview. -- RHaworth 19:29, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Broadcast Center appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. ~**_mustafarox_**~ (talk) 23:47, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "American Folk Musician Tops Charts Reaching The Masses"

A page you created, American Folk Musician Tops Charts Reaching The Masses, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and [[Wikipedia:Your first article|guide to writing your first articl

Your editors don't know what they're really doing and its censorship period. The article was factual and had several sources. I think the problem is you're too lazy to do any real resarch. WE've found another type of wikipedia website that actually accepts our findings and and agrees with our point of view and accepts the truth. Your editors don't realize we've added facts in good faith and you're too lazy to read the article let alone anything else. You know nothing about record breaking history which the article cited that actually happened in 2008 again with several sources verifying this information. Deal with it!

We don't recognize signbot or any of the editors as they were too lazy to read the articles and check the sources given which were truthful and were verifiable. We can also send you the hard copies if need be to prove what we know to be true is true, after which you will be eating crow! We told you so!

 Speaking of neutral points of view, Wikipedia seems to think that it's okay to personally attack the subject in your articles which is against the neutral points of view and yet you won't accept verifiable facts from many sources when presented which means that Wikipedia itself is a hypocrite when it comes to its own policy on pages that continue to become vandalized by those violating a neutral point of view.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lemayfolksinger (talk • contribs) 04:32, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:11, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]