User talk:Whoopdeeda

Blocked[edit]

It's rather obvious this is not your only account, and that you have created it for the sole purpose of avoiding scrutiny in commenting on the case of a blocked user. Very creative, by the way, on choosing the article titles to edit to get yourself autoconfirmed. You know how to request an unblock if you want one. Feel free to do so. --Jayron32 06:09, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I am compelled to do the right thing — and that is speaking out against injustice. I sincerely ask that you restore my comments both at the ArbCom page and at Freakshownerd's talk page. I am sure you will agree that people have been unusually harsh on Freakshownerd's editing style and that he should have a tad more freedom. He is a very prolific content editor and a net positive to the project. Please reflect upon my words. Whoopdeeda (talk) 06:21, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As for the sockpuppet investigation you filed, I declare that I am neither a sock of Grundle nor of ChildofMidnight. I am merely someone who feels that Freakshownerd's circumstances are unjust. Whoopdeeda (talk) 06:23, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If your comments are important, you will log in to your first account and make them using that account. Hiding behind a sockpuppet account does not add any gravitas to important comments. It just looks cowardly. If they are important, stand behind them with your main username. If you find this block unjust, request an unblock using the usual method. --Jayron32 06:25, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your advice. I just wanted Freakshownerd to know that he has support, however little there may be. Whoopdeeda (talk) 06:31, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Whoopdeeda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My main account is now autoblocked, so I cannot express my thoughts using that account. Whoopdeeda (talk) 06:31, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not a reason for unblocking this account. Sandstein 06:56, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have changed the block settings to remove the autoblock. Try again.--Jayron32 06:46, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I know that people are getting riled up with this account, but simply stated, I am not CoM nor Grundle. As I said above, I perceived the gross injustice and attempted to alleviate the pressure on Freakshownerd. I feel sorry that abusive admins like Rd232 are trying to use this occurrence against Freakshownerd, yet another fabricated reason to leave the indef block. He is clearly not a sock, and it's rather tyrannical IMO to block unilaterally with no evidence whatsoever. Anyway, I hope that clears things up. Whoopdeeda (talk) 04:40, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]