User talk:Why did you do it
A tag has been placed on Colemak, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 00:32, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
About article Murray Carter[edit]
Hello, you requested deletion of the article above. Since there's another article written about another person with the same name, I thought I adress the manner here, instead of [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]. I DO think the article is notebale, considering the achievements of mr Carter. I won't sum them up here, because in the world of knivemaking an forging the man is a legend. There are dozens of people, all an authority on the subject, that can attest to this fact. Maybe the way the article was written seems a little like promoting, I will work on that. Furthermore the article is (like all) never done and needs more tweaking, but to have it deleted in such short notice....why? I've come across alot of articles that are poorer written and lack sufficient references. If you look at other knive makers articles, u can see what I mean.
Just because one is not familiar with the subject, does it has to be deleted so quickly? Though I think you have a point in the way it was written.... Anyway, I requested Undeletion of the article. Any thoughts you have on improving it, are VERY welcome...--RobVandeB (talk) 16:09, 19 March 2010 (UTC)