User talk:Wiilciise1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2024[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Haplogroup E-M215, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Skitash (talk) 17:50, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The map doesn’t illustrate the distribution in Somalia where it has the highest frequency. The article clearly states E-M35 originated in East Africa from where it spread. Wiilciise1 (talk) 17:59, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Samaale, you may be blocked from editing. City of Silver 00:16, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t remove anything. I just added context, and linked the Sab clan to Rahanwayne. It’s all correct. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Samaale&diff=prev&oldid=1210711629&title=Samaale&diffonly=1 Wiilciise1 (talk) 00:20, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please can you restore what’s been removed from Somali people, one person removed loads of cited and sourced content for no reason.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Somali_people&diff=prev&oldid=1210349099&title=Somali_people&diffonly=1 Wiilciise1 (talk) 00:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The person has removed long-standing content. The person tried vandalising the Rendille people page aswell but it seems to have been restored now.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Somali_people&diff=prev&oldid=1209343002&title=Somali_people&diffonly=1
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Somali_people&diff=prev&oldid=1209102825&title=Somali_people&diffonly=1 Wiilciise1 (talk) 00:43, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Apaugasma. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Samaale, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. This warning refers specifically to the addition of the word "patriarch" here. Thanks, ☿ Apaugasma (talk ) 14:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can I use this source for “patriarch” page 12 [1] Wiilciise1 (talk) 14:21, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That looks like a good source, but I'm confused why you ask this: it does not use the word "patriarch", but the expression "common ancestor"? Calling Aqil ibn Abi Talib a "patriarch" would tend to validate the ancestry claims as accurate, while scholars are agreed that they are not historical (as we are also noting in the article). It something you might discuss at Talk:Samaale if you wish, but we need Wikipedia content to be directly based upon what reliable sources are saying. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ) 14:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can I remove the links to the Sab clan the red ones since they don’t lead anywhere? Wiilciise1 (talk) 14:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, please see Wikipedia:Red link: "Red links are for subjects that should have articles but do not. They are not only acceptable, but needed in articles. They serve as a clear indication of which articles are in need of creation, and encourage it. Only remove red links if you are certain that Wikipedia should not have an article on that subject."
All the red links in Samaale refer to notable subjects, which should have articles per Wikipedia's notability policy. Thanks for taking this into consideration, ☿ Apaugasma (talk ) 14:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Samaale into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. This one refers to the content copied from the Aqil ibn Abi Talib page in this edit. Thanks for bearing with me, and feel free to ask any questions, ☿ Apaugasma (talk ) 14:19, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Somali language did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → check Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! LandLing 07:07, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Bennyblanco10 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bennyblanco10. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Spicy (talk) 19:52, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]