User talk:Wikifreak99
- Wikifreak99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 71.184.197.204 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "J-melz". The reason given for J-melz's block is: "Vandalism-only account".
Decline reason: You are directly blocked. This account is a sock of J-melz. Denied. — IrishGuy talk 18:31, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Wikifreak99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Exact Quote from wikipedia rulebook "the principle "Ignorantia juris non excusat" (Latin for: "ignorance of the law does not excuse") is incompatible with the policies of not biting and assuming good faith. If you prosecute and judge people because they are ignorant of our policies and guidelines, you are in fact violating our policies and guidelines!" my other account j-melz was dissallowed from stating my freedom speech therefor i am forced to state my opinions on this account, it is unfair that i was banned due to my ignorance of wikipedia policies
Decline reason:
You weren't blocked for being ignorant of policy. As you amassed numerous warnings with your other account for willfully violating policy, you created this second account to continue anew. Denied. — IrishGuy talk 19:28, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Do you have any plans to contribute productively, if unblocked? If so, please elaborate and be specific regarding those plans. If you don't plan to contribute, there's no reason to unblock your account. – Luna Santin (talk) 19:23, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Wikifreak99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
yes now that i know the rules of wikipedia i plan on creating and editing pages productively, i promise not to vandalize any other pages in the future, please unblock account j-melz as well if u do decide to unblock this account thank you
Decline reason:
Account clearly abusive. — Yamla 19:36, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Wikifreak99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
And actually the only warnings i amassed were due to my ignorance of how to dispute a delted page, i beleive you are mistaken, i was never given a vandalism warning, thank you for your time
Decline reason:
Unblock abuse. --Yamla 19:36, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Um. No. You received this warning for these edits. Then you turned around and created this sock. IrishGuy talk 19:34, 22 October 2007 (UTC)