User talk:Wikintern-MM
Welcome!
Hello, Wikintern-MM, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Cary Bass demandez 16:16, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
User modifications
[edit]Note to all on talk page. This user is performing courtesy blankings for the Wikimedia Foundation. Please discuss any issues with me. Cary Bass demandez 17:08, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
:Yeah, stop doing that. I think an immediate block is called for, as this might be an automated thing doing it. Arcayne (cast a spell) 18:46, 3 May 2007 (UTC) Update: It appears that there is more to this icecube beneath the surface, so calling for an immediate block maynot be appropriate here. Since someone seemed to respond to my post, I cannot just delete it, so I've made it all strikethrough-y. Arcayne (cast a spell) 19:14, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- ...and here I was just going to ask why you were editing my archives... Welcome aboard!--Isotope23 18:55, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Wow! Note however, that that's courtesy, not curtsey. Unless, of course, they're being super-duper polite in a girly kinda way :) - Alison ☺ 19:18, 3 May 2007 (UTC) (sorry, sorry. Leaving now!)
- It would be very useful if you could explicitly flag these actions as WP:OFFICE-approved, say in the edit summary. General policy says that you do not edit other users' comments on talk pages and that the right to vanish does not apply to users who have been banned from the community. I have no problem with the Office overriding this, but there was no indication in your edit summary that you were acting on behalf of the office. Thanks, Gwernol 20:37, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Fair point. However, noting them as OFFICE actions will only draw attention to the changes and thus overriding their raison d'être. Note that their userpage already clarifies this - Alison ☺ 20:45, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hi... can we bring the discussion to my talk page?. Cary Bass demandez 20:48, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Fair point. However, noting them as OFFICE actions will only draw attention to the changes and thus overriding their raison d'être. Note that their userpage already clarifies this - Alison ☺ 20:45, 3 May 2007 (UTC)