User talk:Wincorduan

This stub article is clearly written from the perspective of a member of Gaudiya Vaishnava. Brahman nirguna cannot possibly be personal godhead since personhood is an attribute. In Gaudiya Vaishnava Brahman is seen as the formal "abstraction" as it were of Lord Krishna, the highest form of personal Godhead. That's fine as far as that branch of Hinduism goes. However, as the author hopefully realizes, under the heading of Advaita Vedanta that identification does not hold up. So, one should add some more information on Brahman nirguna from the monistic traditions. This is my first time interacting on Wikipedia, so I want to be as slow and careful as I can. I'd be happy to add to the current stub, but I'd like to get some reaction to my comment before I plunge in. Thanks. Wincorduan (talk) 23:12, 29 August 2014 (UTC)Win Corduan