User talk:Witeink

problems

If anyone has a problem with my posts please specify.Witeinkρεβῼ 02:03, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Reason for reverting your edits

The reason that I reverted your edits to XBOX 720 is that your edits were conversational in nature, and involved commenting on the accuracy of the article. The best place to leave these comments is on the article's Talk page, which is designed for discussions of topics such as what you added. This is especially important because of the fact that this article has been nominated for deletion, so people may already be discussing the issue. I sincerely apologize if the warning I issued when reverting your edits seemed overbearing, but they are designed to draw your attention to issues with edits. I appreciate your taking the time to ask for input, however, since it shows a willingness to learn and move forward. Thanks! Windchaser (talk) 02:21, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Generally, speaking, no. You'll get warned a few times before you get in any trouble.

Unless, of course, you go back to doing stuff like this. If you actually plan to be helpful, knock yourself out. Look through here, to see what is and isn't allowed. And to sign your messages, put this at the end of your posts ~~~~, instead of 'signing' them. HalfShadow 03:52, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By the way my nick is because im half wite and love to write.Witeinkρεβῼ Μιλάω/Κοτσάνι 04:24, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Help

I have asked halfshadow how i can help wikipedia and he "is not obliged to answer me" if anyone would be so kind as to tell me where i can help or help me to learn more about wikipedia please don't hesitate.Witeinkρεβῼ Μιλάω/Κοτσάνι 04:25, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Koffee kate's

A tag has been placed on Koffee kate's requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 02:43, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Witeink, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! ttonyb (talk) 03:01, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to XBOX 720. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Boomshadow ^talk _contribs 04:30, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When you're talking about it costing $547,100, It's vandalism. Boomshadow ^talk _contribs 04:34, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Secondly, the product is not even out yet! It's just speculation. How can you know the price of a product not even launched?! --Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! 04:41, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Either way, you are going to get a warning. If I were you Boomshadow, I'll smack his edit with failure to cite a verifiable source.--Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! 04:47, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ok i accept the warning but i am wondering why you are being so severe with this mistake. Witeinkρεβῼ Μιλάω/Κοτσάνι 04:52, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tyw7 has a very good point. Citing sources is a good thing. Sorry about the whole period/comma thing. Boomshadow ^talk _contribs 04:56, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Its OK its just like everytime i edit a page i get vandelism.Witeinkρεβῼ Μιλάω/Κοτσάνι 04:58, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FIrst of all, the article is about a speculated products. How many of these products actually makes it to the market? I could say Apple is planning an Iphone with a Intel Atom processor. There are many product speculation out there! Second, how in the world can you tell how much an XBOX 720, a product not even on the market yet, cost $525??? --Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! 05:04, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article said 400-600 euros wich is the amount that i posted in american money.I didnt mean to make a big deal out of it i just didn't understand.Witeinkρεβῼ Μιλάω/Κοτσάνι 05:06, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

:::thanks for deleting the article and getting all this crap overwith.Witeinkρεβῼ Μιλάω/Κοτσάνι 05:17, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Witeink

Hi Witeink. I noticed you created an RfA page some time ago. I was wondering as to what the status of that RfA might be. Please let me know if you still intend to run for adminship with that RfA; otherwise, I'll go ahead and delete it for you in about a week or so from today. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:31, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 20:48, 7 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Per [1] and the other obvious stuff. Block reset on Halfwite's account. –MuZemike 20:48, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]