User talk:Word39

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Dingbat2007 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to WMC-TV. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Mhking (talk) 03:12, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
don't tell me what to do. --Word39 (talk) 03:14, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Template:QHK TV. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --Mhking (talk) 03:16, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are NO broadcast GSN or ABC Family affiliates, and there are no stations that hold PBS and other network affiliations at the same time. Please stop entering false information, and stop creating sockpuppet accounts. --Mhking (talk) 03:16, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of W45BM

A tag has been placed on W45BM, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

hoax television station that does not exist

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mhking (talk) 03:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indef blocked re sockpuppetry concerns

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

LessHeard vanU (talk) 09:22, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(redacted) Personal attacks, including threats of violence, are not permitted and if you continue this page will be protected from editing by you. LessHeard vanU (talk) 09:48, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Word39 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

76.199.87.47 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Word39". The reason given for Word39's block is: "Block evasion".

Blocking administrator: LessHeard vanU (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Sandstein 23:14, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talkpage protected

In view of the editors use of this page other than to contest the block or otherwise appeal their sanction, I have protected the page indefinitely. Any sysop may remove the protection without reference to me should they feel protection is no longer needed. LessHeard vanU (talk) 13:33, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of KLUF-LD

The article KLUF-LD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 15:11, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]