User talk:Xoxi

This is Xoxi's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Meow

Britney Spears

The image has been deleted. You're restoring a red link. Corvus cornix 18:37, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Argh. Sorry about that. It would be nice if people actually followed procedure rather than randomly deleting things they don't happen to like. Xoxixox 18:41, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was speedy deleted as an I4, "lack of licensing information". Corvus cornix 18:46, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was under the impression that I put all the proper information, but do you happen to have a link to the page with the specifics for that? I read the guidelines, and the page that had the info for what constitutes free use, and didn't see anything about licensing information. I apologize for the oversight...any info would be appreciated :) Xoxixox 18:50, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also when I looked on the speedy deletion page, it says that there are certain procedures, such as notifying the uploader to fix the problem. Any idea as to why this wasn't done? Xoxixox 18:55, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if this is what you're looking for, but try Wikipedia:Fair use review. I can't see the image page, since I'm not an admin, so I can't tell what you might have done wrong. Corvus cornix 20:48, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

copyright violations can be removed immediately there is no waiting period yuckfoo 01:59, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just read the messages in this talk page. So I wasn't the one that removed the image. Oidia (talk) 04:21, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Domesticrabbit.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Domesticrabbit.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 21:09, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Wolpertanger.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Wolpertanger.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Wolpertanger.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Wolpertanger.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Wolpertanger.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at File talk:Wolpertanger.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Wolpertanger.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:27, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]