User talk:Ygarbourg

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this draft. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

[[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] · [[Special:Contribs/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

References

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:24, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:COI Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Doc James: Thank you for taking the time to review my edits of the page Paula method.

References: Were there particular references that you thought wrongly used/formatted? I used mainly the founder's published book (written in 1982, and republished in many editions and 3 languages since) and all the clinical trial papers I could find in PubMed/CrossRef. I also used 3 links to two websites, which represent the 2 recognized Paula Method institutions - an Israeli practitioner union, and the international institution holding copyright rights to the method and the founder's book. I used these in representing anecdotal case histories, and I represented those references as such, as opposed to scientific/medical research.
COI: Noted. The article as it stands (a) does not describe the the Paula Method accurately, and (b) uses a single reference on an efficacy issue that appears contentious in scientific literature. Can I ask you or someone in medical editorial group help me by requesting you to edit it, or to review my own edit to make sure I have not inserted any bias?

Proposed deletion of Paula method

The article Paula method has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Mostly primary sources, possibly self-promotion

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Resequent (talk) 14:51, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]