User talk:Yob 1971
Welcome!
Hello, Yob 1971, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Zeljko Ranogajec
[edit]Before making wholesale changes of obvious importance to an article, it's preferable to open a discussion on your intentions in the relevant article's Talk page. Coming to the specifics of the Zeljko Ranogajec entry, the person's secrecy/privacy is an important issue. The person is notable for the alleged size of his gambling and his purported winnings. None of this has been resolutely verified - and he denies it. He maintains a very private lifestyle, which inhibits verification. This is why it is important (and not at all "waffle") to include this information in the encyclopaedia. -The Gnome (talk) 19:32, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- It's already stated in the article that x and y are 'reported' or 'alleged' estimates. There is no need for an entire redundant section about this. Yob 1971 (talk) 07:09, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
- That's exactly the point. It's easy to characterise something as "alleged"; the hard part is to prove that it is alleged - in other words, "not proven". As we know, it is impossible to prove a negative. Therefore, these particular attributes of the subject's private life (secrecy, privacy) corroborate the allegation that it could all be blown up out of proportion.
- Plus, the intensively maintained privacy of some persons, profiled in Wikipedia, is often, when notable in itself, part of their life story. (Trivial example: Howard Hughes.) In the case of Zeljko Ranogajec, we have a clear desire from his part to remain out of the public light that makes it notable in itself. Take care. -The Gnome (talk) 15:55, 2 July 2011 (UTC)