User talk:Youngman24

November 2017

Your recent editing history at Naturism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dr. K. 14:55, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Naturism. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dr. K. 14:58, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Naturism. Dr. K. 16:14, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DMacks (talk) 19:44, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Wayne Jayes (talk) 14:59, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask what value the image you have added to Naturism gives to the article. Wiki is trying to be an encyclopedia and I at the moment cannot see how it informs the general reader. Reply here I will be watching the page and it keeps the discussion together.

Thanks Edmund Patrick – confer 17:00, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I Mr. Patrick, the reason of the picture is to demonstrate the essence of naturism in a natural setting like naturism is. Naturism is natural and some of the pictures in your article show nude people who not naturist but nudist and some of those naturist picture dont show the human body in a natural way. Like in Finland culture, alot of naturist keep their body natural like the way the picture demonstrate it. Alot of those picture show more of West Culture nudist but where the natural naturist ? Tx you alot for your interest

Excellent a start to the conservation. An interesting point you put forward, not one I had thought of. So now if I can I would recommend you do not reinstate the image that you want to use, rather place it in the talk page and ask others if it would be acceptable, raising the points you have above. The article is many that attract "interesting" edits so is cared for by a number of editors, who actually may end up agreeing with you and assist in finding a suitable image (not necessarily the one used) to tell that part of naturism. Thanks Edmund Patrick – confer 07:17, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. . Dr. K. 03:50, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:13, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]