Jump to content

User talk:Ytfig11/sandbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello Erhall (talk) 22:00, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Needs to be in paragraphs and in sandbox otherwise good job! Jessben12 (talk)

I made the same mistake that it wasn't in my sandbox. Just move it and you will be good! AHughes08 (talk) 22:32, 14 February 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ytfig11 (talkcontribs) [reply]

winona2012 The sources you have a great! Good start, you should go into more detail however, which Im sure you will.

t is coming along well, I am interested in your results. The only potential problem may be that the Upper-Class school districts may still have students from lower socioeconomic classes, but that may be an insignificant number. Jlinehan07 (talk) 22:13, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, other than a few mechanical mistakes! If you find your topic to be too expansive, you might want to try narrowing it down a bit more. I look forward to your research! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cbrignull07 (talkcontribs) 22:22, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


In a review of literature as well as in a wikipedia article "I" is not used. This is a neutral point of view - sharing of resources and validating information. Erhall (talk) 16:06, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Good start Gift! Couple of things, in the first paragraph you might want to site sources for your facts to help strengthen your arguement and give it more weight. Also, in one of your last couple of paragraphs you use SES, what does this mean? Otherwise, like stated earlier, great start and I look forward to reading the rest of your lit review! Cstene07 (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cstene07 (talkcontribs) 07:51, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Gift! After reading part of your lit review, I'm really interested in your topic. The only comments I have is defining SES, and citing more sources. This topic is gonna rock! Wjansen08 (talk) 20:04, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you have a great introduction to your literature review. Your topic is somewhat similar to mine. Jjdick3978 —Preceding undated comment added 20:38, 21 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achievement_gap Erhall (talk) 05:05, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]