User talk:Zabooba

September 2021[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 00:57, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zabooba (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My reason is to ask for a temporary unblock is that I deserve no less than a full public indictment with charges against me, containing all criticisms, made by declared and non-anonymous persons, who are by their public appearance leaning toward the honorable category and not the dishonorable.

And I don't want to be blocked for any political reason due to undeclared political actors operating on Wikipedia, by any "powers" which come from unfair process particularly if its secret, or secretive process particularly if its unfair, or by control of Wikipedia by governments which are non-declared.

Particularly those who don't sign a public constitution, and whom honor secretive, militaristic, or non-democratic controls. Then I can ask that charges be made against me which are declared, i.e. open and full, and formal, i.e. composed by a body acting through open process, perhaps petition process. Thank you, -Zabooba (talk) 01:15, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 01:28, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The charges are public: you are WP:NOTHERE to build an encyclopedia. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 01:31, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Charges need to be public and substantiated, unless you are from the dark lands, in which case an OK from your Mum is all you need. I understand an encyclopedia to be a compendium of all knowledge. If for example, war is a topic, then how wars start is to be included. If wars are sometimes started because of the greed of entrenched-power actors, then that need to be stated in the article. Otherwise the idea you have of what an "encyclopedia" is is different from the above idea, which is the common one, as used in the common language of common humans. There is an idea that there must be room for censorship, but then censorship is imposed by governments only, and each censored element needs to be indicated and signed by the specific government or governments requesting it to be censored.

We deal with China for example, straightforwardly, in that we state that China's crackdown during the Tiananmen uprising must not be censored. We deal similarly with the British, and allegations that they were complicit in starting WWII, with Hitler as their employee, not some rogue actor. And so when Tucker Carlson of FoxNews slips in a little report inside a "Canadian Church fires" piece, on the toppling of a Victoria I statue, we the common public want to see an article on it, and we want to know more about that event and those brave democratic people. -Zabooba (talk) 03:20, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Graham87 03:46, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]