User talk:Zamujene

March 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Elgi Equipments, a page you might created yourself or have been involved in. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Cutlass ^Ciera 16:37, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Elgi Equipments shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Per the GIANT NOTICE THAT SAYS "o not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. If you created this page and you disagree with the given reason for deletion, you can click the button below and leave a message explaining why you believe it should not be deleted." You are the primary editor and moved it into mainspace and therefor cannot remove the tag. CUPIDICAE💕 16:43, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Further, if you attack me and insinuate ulterior motives again as you did here, I will request a block at ANI. CUPIDICAE💕 16:45, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care whether I'm novice editor or not, I will continue removing your tag Zamujene (talk) 16:45, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I really mean what I said. I don't care your block because you are not administrator. Zamujene (talk) 16:46, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Elgi Equipments. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 16:54, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 17:25, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Glory Oguegbu

The article Glory Oguegbu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find enough in-depth coverage from reliable sources to show they meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:24, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]