User talk:Zr6374

October 2008

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Knowledge. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Hardyplants (talk) 20:05, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Radical skepticism

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Radical skepticism, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TallNapoleon (talk) 22:28, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since you objected to deletion, I removed the "prod" = "proposed deletion" template for you (which is how objection to this form of deletion is done) and put your comment on the talk page, which was the clear intent of your edits. Anyone can remove a prod template; if it is no one had bothered to remove it, the article could be deleted in 5 days. Welcome, John Z (talk) 01:01, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Radical skepticism

I have nominated Radical skepticism, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radical skepticism. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TallNapoleon (talk) 02:31, 26 October 2008 (UTC) TallNapoleon (talk) 02:31, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]