Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fog Warning (film): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by G-man80 to last version by PC78 (HG)
G-man80 (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
:{{la|Fog Warning (film)}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Fog Warning (film)|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fog Warning (film)]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fog Warning (film)|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 January 11#{{anchorencode:Fog Warning (film)}}|View log]])</noinclude>
:{{la|Fog Warning (film)}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Fog Warning (film)|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fog Warning (film)]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fog Warning (film)|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 January 11#{{anchorencode:Fog Warning (film)}}|View log]])</noinclude>
No notability asserted. [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 01:28, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
No notability asserted. [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 01:28, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Speedy Delete''' - The article seems to mainly cover g-man's review of the film.
*'''Speedy Delete''' - The article seems to mainly cover g-man's review of the film and most of the edits on the page were done by someone with a similar name. The film is not notable and article would need to be rewritten if the film became notable. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Nathan Orth|Nathan Orth]] ([[User talk:Nathan Orth|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nathan Orth|contribs]]) 01:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Film|list of Film-related deletion discussions]]. </small><small>—[[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 11:32, 11 January 2009 (UTC)</small>
*'''Keep'''. G-man's POV is out. Have been doing clean-up on the article, and found some decent sources and both positive and negative reviews. Did use the "G-Man" review, but made sure to state it as a blog. Will remove it as I find more. Will continue working on the article... as it now tickles the requirements of [[WP:NF]] and I have more to add. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<b><sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup></b>]]'' 13:55, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
:*'''Update''' I have just completed initial expansion and sourcing to show significant coverage in multiple sources independent of the subject.... for an Indy, it gets as much love as hate. Still needs categories, but it now meets [[WP:NF]]. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<b><sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup></b>]]'' 19:59, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:35, 11 January 2009

Fog Warning (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No notability asserted. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 01:28, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy Delete - The article seems to mainly cover g-man's review of the film.