Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/WikitanvirBot

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

WikitanvirBot

Operator: Wikitanvir (talk · contribs)

Automatic or Manually assisted: Mostly automatic

Programming language(s): Python (pywikipedia)

Source code available: Yes

Function overview: Addition, change, or removal of interwikis.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): Daily

Estimated number of pages affected: Few

Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Maybe

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Yes, in bnwiki.

Function details: Add or remove or change of interwikis.

Discussion

Have you read through the local bot policy? Will the bot be staying out of the template namespace, as required by our policy on interwiki linking bots? Will the bot be running with the new -cleanup option of interwiki.py that removes interwikis only to inexisting pages, or with the previous more aggressive -force option that removes interwikis to different namespaces as well? - EdoDodo ^talk 15:05, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm aware of local bot policy, The bot will mostly run in main namspace, but sometimes it will run in category namespace too. It's not specially made to run in template namespace, so it won't. And yes, it will run with -cleanup option, instead of previous -force option. :) — Tanvir • 18:15, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Good good. Feel free to take the time you need for trial, don't worry about going over the limit too much: WP:NOTBUREAUCRACY. - EdoDodo ^talk 18:22, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. — Tanvir • 15:44, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{BAG assistance needed}} My bot has finished the trial for 6 days now. Like to see a outcome. Regards, — Tanvir • 12:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. Trial looks okay. Sorry for the delay. - EdoDodo ^talk 15:44, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.