Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Dawn at Swifts Creek

Shows dawn quite well - the sun inching it's way up, a bit of morning mist not yet burnt off, all in the beautiful setting of rural Australia.

Support Self Nom. --Fir0002 06:23, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I like the image, but it clearly has artefacts in the sky. Blocky transitions when there's a change in color. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:46, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose it's an OK photo, but this is meant to be an encyclopaedia, not a photography competition. I really can't see how this adds to the article in the slightest (in fact, IMO, it looks slightly odd sitting there at the end), nor can I really see how it would fit into another article. chowells 15:12, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Another nice panorama Fir but not your best and I have to say I feel this is another with very little encyclopedic value. ~ Veledan • Talk 17:48, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose. Nice image, but a little lacking in encyclopedic value. I can't see any artifacts in the sky though... enochlau (talk) 00:59, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Nice enough image, but it's wrong for the sunrise page, IMO. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 01:44, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Doesn't look good- I'm not a photographer tho Borisblue 01:48, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. As said: FPC is not a photo competition. Just because an image is nice or technically brilliant doesn't qualify it for FP. --Janke | Talk 07:10, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose full ack. --Dschwen 20:01, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. Flcelloguy (A note?) 16:09, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Raven4x4x 06:48, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]