Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Eureka Tower
Appearance
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2012 at 02:30:03 (UTC)
- Reason
- Large size, crisp image. Has high EV showing one of the tallest buildings in Australia and residential buildings in the world. Featured on German Wikipedia.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Eureka Tower, List of tallest residential buildings in the world, Grocon
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Creator
- Diliff
- Support as nominator --Chris857 (talk) 02:30, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support I had thought about nominating this previously but I forgot about it. Pine✉ 04:11, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support Alborzagros (talk) 08:25, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support per nom... Quick Question however - what are the golden flies/wasps near the base for? Is that a permanant feature or a temporary art installation? gazhiley 08:42, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't find anything that explicitly said, but "Queen Bee @ Eureka Tower" states that "Katsalidis and Stringer had discussed the idea of making a permanent installation on various building projects over the years and the image of a Queen Bee and colony had a obvious conceptual compatibility to the context of this gigantic residential tower." That makes me think it is permanent (and it is still there in a 2010 Google streetview image). {{commons:template:FoP-Australia}} says that permanent sculpture is FoP. Should a mention be added to the description page? Chris857 (talk) 16:30, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
- It's de minimis anyway- nothing to worry about from a copyright perspective. J Milburn (talk) 19:45, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
- Oh I don't have any concerns about copyright Mr Milburn - but I agree with Chris that something should be added to the description or even the actual page itself as there is nothing to explain it. It's too distinctive a feature in my opinion to be ignored, and if Chris is correct that it's a permanant thing then would be nice to be mentioned. Thank you Chris857 for your detective work! gazhiley 08:42, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support Proper execution as far as I can tell. Good point of view, sharp, nice (presumed) stitching. Wish all my panorama have this many vertical guidelines ;) - Blieusong (talk) 17:39, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
- Here's the whole panorama. File:Melbourne Skyline from Rialto Crop - Nov 2008.jpg. Chris857 (talk) 01:39, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for this link - surprise surprise another FP by Dillif... Anyone would think he's good at this photography malarky....... gazhiley 08:59, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, he puts all of us WP photographers to shame... --WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 20:04, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- Wow, nice panorama.--WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 20:04, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support Pretty good. Dusty777 17:44, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Mediran talk 10:45, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support per nom.--WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 20:04, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support Per supporters above. Alborzagros (talk) 13:46, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support Tomer T (talk) 14:21, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Promoted File:Eureka Tower, Melbourne - Nov 2008.jpg --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:44, 27 September 2012 (UTC)