Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Burnie CBD and Port Panorama.jpg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Burnie CBD and Port, Tasmania, Australia[edit]

Original - Burnie CBD and Port, Tasmania, Australia
Reason
High Quality and informative for the related articles
Articles this image appears in
Burnie, Bass Strait
Creator
Noodle snacks
Try moving the image back and forth sideways (In a larger zoom). You can see the horizon rise and fall. I think its appropriate for this kind of image. A curve too drastic would decrease the image's quality. SpencerT♦C 22:28, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I already did before commenting here.--Caspian blue 22:47, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The earth may be round, but the curvature of the earth is not going to be visible until you get to a significant altitude, never mind sea level. A scene such as this should certainly have a flat horizon for enc value as it would not have appeared curved to the naked eye. We would oppose a curved land horizon for sure, and a sea horizon should be the same. If the image were taken from several tens of thousands feet then a properly visible curve might be acceptable. Mfield (talk) 16:34, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Oppose Decent EV, but poor time of day for photography - the lighting is just too harsh with bright roofs, unappealing skyline and strong shadows. Also there appears to be some posterization in the sky (~1000px from the LHS) --Fir0002 04:10, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 23:58, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]