Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Old Plovdiv
Appearance
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0a/Straat_in_Oud_Plovdiv_1.jpeg/220px-Straat_in_Oud_Plovdiv_1.jpeg)
Perfectly captures the atmosphere and characteristic architecture of the city's old town part. The street in the photo is one of the main streets in Old Plovdiv that is often frequented by tourists on their way to St. Constantine and Helena church. I believe the colours and the framing are great, and while resolution could've been better, the current one is good enough. Photo taken and uploaded by Jeroen Kransen and used in several articles, including Plovdiv, Bulgaria and Bulgarian National Revival.
- Nominate and support. - Todor→Bozhinov 12:20, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose I just don't feel that the framing is interesting. I'm also not getting a really good sense of the buildings' architecture. Zepheus 17:09, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Zepheus. Alr 17:59, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Plovdiv is way more interesting than this. Can't see much here, can't see the gate clearly, nor the houses, nor the street itself. — Vildricianus 21:19, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Not all that interesting. --Geoffrey Gibson 22:12, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Nice, but "artsy" as opposed to "encyclopedic". Try FPC at Commons. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 21:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
- support Agree with Todor Bozhinov--Givern 07:28, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose I just don't think it's that interesting (though I've never been to the city in question). It's just a picture of a street. Is the gate tilted somewhat, or am I being very stupid (the drainpipe looks fine)? -Salur 16:26, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Not promoted Raven4x4x 07:27, 7 July 2006 (UTC)