Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Vladimir Gligorov
Appearance
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2012 at 19:15:17 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/74/Vladimir_Gligorov.jpg/392px-Vladimir_Gligorov.jpg)
- Reason
- High Ev as lead image, good quality
- Articles in which this image appears
- Vladimir Gligorov
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
- Creator
- Medija centar Beograd
- Support as nominator --Spongie555 (talk) 19:15, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm not fond of this pose and the fact that the portrait is pretty much the face only. I think that we could get a better alternative. Also the article is barely stub quality and has only one reference. Pine✉ 10:10, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think the pose is inconsistent with WP policy. --WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 18:15, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- Wiki-policy for featured images that is... --WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 19:43, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think the pose is inconsistent with WP policy. --WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 18:15, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose per pine. Alborzagros (talk) 12:02, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose. It is a high quality image with good composition. My concern is EV. If the article grows beyond stub, I would support this becoming a featured picture. --WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 18:15, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose That background looks very out of focus.I can't make out what the writing is supposed to say,but it distracts from the subject of the picture itself Lemon martini (talk) 19:24, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- In my opinion, that is an excellent use of DOF to stand out the subject of the image. Otherwise the background and the writing would distract the viewer from the subject itself. --WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 19:58, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- I really don't understand the opposition, such DOF is so classic for portraits. --PierreSelim (talk) 11:46, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- In my opinion, that is an excellent use of DOF to stand out the subject of the image. Otherwise the background and the writing would distract the viewer from the subject itself. --WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 19:58, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose - Good picture but not very intersting. Jimerb (talk) 13:43, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 23:24, 28 August 2012 (UTC)