Wikipedia:Peer review/2007 UEFA Champions League Final/archive1

2007 UEFA Champions League Final

I've listed this article for peer review because, it has just been promoted to a Good Article, and I would like to know, how I can improve it to Featured article status

Thanks,

NapHit 11:37, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As I could see, The Spanish article about the CL 2006-07 is an feature article. You could take that for reference. I think the difference between those articles is, the Spanish article is more smooth than this one. Raymond Giggs 08:32, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Automated Peer Review The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.^[?]
There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City.^[?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
The script has spotted the following contractions: wasn't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.^[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Davnel03 18:59, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest taking great care in the "problems before the match section" to ensure verifiability and show NPOV. For example, "This was due to the large number of Liverpool fans who had gained entry with forged tickets or without tickets at all." would definitely need a supporting citation, while "some Liverpool fans attempting to jump over the barriers" is not supported by the ref at the end of the sentence. That ref also mentions Italians with forged tickets, casting some doubt on the first quote I give. I also noticed a few WP:DASH issues. J.Winklethorpe ^talk 00:15, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Following up on the dash issues as requested; they were in "Second half", and I've fixed them. They were hyphens used for punctuation purposes, not to link prefixes or compound adjectives, and so needed to be em-dashes. There are no other problems with them in the article, so I'm guessing you knew this and had just missed those. Anyway, looking at it again, the whole sentence now looks dash-happy—you may wish to space the em-dashes, or reword it, or use colons. J.Winklethorpe ^talk 22:33, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]