Science desk
< July 14	<< Jun \| July \| Aug >>	July 16 >

Welcome to the Wikipedia Science Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.

July 15

The holy grail of hydrogen

"Get more energy out than you put in." (https://astronaerospace.com/) Is this legit? Has this been demonstrated or are they just good at making slick CGI animations (better than at spelling)? Thank you. Hevesli (talk) 16:33, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wasted several seconds looking at it. It's what we call a solidworks engine. take any positive displacement pump, add fuel and oxidiser, hey presto semi believable engine animation. The total absence of technical info in the youtube I saw is a bit of a giveaway. "Get more energy out than you put in." yeah and I've got a bridge to sell you. Greglocock (talk) 05:54, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An exception might be a hydrogen bomb. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 06:17, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the H-bomb is considered a "holy grail". The term has been used for nuclear fusion as a source of "clean energy", where the hope is that "we can obtain more energy than we put in".^[1] In this context, the wording "obtain more energy than is put in" is IMO somewhat justifiable: after all,

E

=

mc 2

gives mass–energy equivalence, not mass–energy equality. Claiming to obtain more energy than is put in for combustion engines is not justifiable. --Lambiam 13:03, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]